PRI and July 6 Election in Mexico
- Share via
On May 27, you published a column by Pamela K. Starr that refers to the upcoming federal elections in Mexico (“Ruling Party Dusts Off Its Old Tricks”). In order to give to your readers a better view of the Mexican electoral system, some facts are necessary. First, when Starr suggests that the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) could win only through fear and mud, she is underestimating the Mexican people by supposing that we do not have a reasoned vote. The evidence proves the contrary; in some states citizens have elected a governor from one party and the majority of the local congress from a different party. This just shows the electorate’s maturity.
Second, when Starr mentions “old tricks,” what tricks does she mean? She forgets or does not want to mention that the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) is now completely autonomous and independent. Its council is integrated by independent and distinguished citizens elected by congress. The council has no government participation and political parties have voice but no vote. Moreover, the 1994 federal elections were observed by thousands of Mexican citizens and foreign visitors who have witnessed the legality and equity of the process. In the past, the PRI was accused of using federal funds; however, under the new electoral law this is impossible, because there are limitations with respect to financing parties’ campaigns as well as the strict expenditure limits closely overseen by the IFE.
Last year some local elections took place. The results in some cases were adverse to the PRI. However, the PRI has respected the people’s decision and it will do the same on July 6 and in all future elections. Therefore, the argument of using fear in the campaign has no foundation.
ALFREDO PHILLIPS OLMEDO
Coordinator General
of International Affairs, PRI
Mexico City
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.